Presentation on law "The death penalty as an exceptional measure of punishment under Russian legislation." Death penalty: pros and cons

Death penalty: pros and cons

The death penalty is one of the oldest punishments known to mankind. As a matter of fact, the death penalty was used even before criminal law in the modern sense of the word arose. The death penalty is one of the oldest punishments known to mankind. As a matter of fact, the death penalty was used even before criminal law in the modern sense of the word arose.

In medieval England, people were hanged for the smallest thefts, and in large quantities. In the London Borough of Tyburn alone, an average of 560 people were executed each year. For counterfeiting, they were boiled in boiling water or oil (until the 17th century). In addition, deformities were used, such as cutting off the nose, ears, and tongue. In total, 123 crimes were punishable by death according to the court verdict. Hanging for theft was abolished early in Victoria's reign, but the death penalty was still applied to those who committed murder unless the killer could prove his insanity. This order continued for another 130 years. DEATH PENALTY IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES. In Great Britain:

In France: In France, under the old regime, regicides were executed by quartering. Wheeling, hanging by the rib and other painful punishments were also widespread, especially zealously used against Huguenots and rebels during the reign of Louis 14. In 1792, the guillotine was introduced, and subsequently most of the death penalty, except by verdict of a military court (in this case execution was common) were carried out through guillotining (in the French Criminal Code of 1810, Article 12 states that “everyone sentenced to death shall have his head cut off”). Already on January 21, 1793, Louis 14 was executed by guillotine.

In the German states, heads were traditionally cut off; the decapitation weapon was not an axe, but a sword. In the German states, heads were traditionally cut off; the decapitation weapon was not an axe, but a sword. For adultery, they were quartered, while for women who committed adultery, as well as for mothers who killed their child, a special capital punishment was provided: drowning. There were other types of death penalty (disposal, burial alive, impalement, etc.). For adultery, they were quartered, while for women who committed adultery, as well as for mothers who killed their child, a special capital punishment was provided: drowning. There were other types of death penalty (disposal, burial alive, impalement, etc.). Under Hitler, the death penalty was introduced through Under Hitler, the death penalty was introduced by hanging and the guillotine. hanging and guillotine. In Germany:

Participants in the unsuccessful plot against Hitler on July 20, 1944 were hanged not with ordinary ropes, but with tight strings, which intensified the torment. The army used shooting. The gas chamber, the most famous means of mass destruction, was used mainly in concentration camps (this means not only camps for other nations, but also camps for Germans who opposed the existing regime), but many revisionists deny its existence, and moreover, as a means of execution. it has never been used in court. Participants in the unsuccessful plot against Hitler on July 20, 1944 were hanged not with ordinary ropes, but with tight strings, which intensified the torment. The army used shooting. The gas chamber, the most famous means of mass destruction, was used mainly in concentration camps (this means not only camps for other nations, but also camps for Germans who opposed the existing regime), but many revisionists deny its existence, and moreover, as a means of execution. it has never been used in court.

In the USA: In the United States, culture in general and the culture of execution in particular are borrowed from the mother country. In the old days there were laws as cruel as in England. In the United States, culture in general and the culture of execution in particular are borrowed from the mother country. In the old days there were laws as cruel as in England. On December 26, 1862, during the Civil War, thirty-eight Indians were hanged on one gallows in the northern state of Minnesota. On December 26, 1862, during the Civil War, thirty-eight Indians were hanged on one gallows in the northern state of Minnesota.

At the end of the 19th century, the electric chair was invented, first used in 1890 and soon came into general use, so that in many states it replaced hanging. At the end of the 19th century, the electric chair was invented, first used in 1890 and soon came into general use, so that in many states it replaced hanging. The gas chamber was introduced even earlier than in Germany, namely in 1924, but it did not become so widespread. The gas chamber was introduced even earlier than in Germany, namely in 1924, but it did not become so widespread. At present, the laws of various states provide for five methods of death penalty: At present, the laws of various states provide for five methods of death penalty: -Hanging -Hanging -Firing -Firing -Electric chair -Electric chair -Gas chamber -Gas chamber -Lethal injection. -Lethal injection. However, recently (since the beginning of the 21st century), the vast majority of executions are carried out by lethal injection. The electric chair is also occasionally used. The other three methods have not been used since the late 20th century. They remain in the laws of only a small number of states, and all of these states also use lethal injection, and the use of alternative methods in many cases is limited by various conditions (for example, only those convicted who have committed a crime or received a death sentence before a certain date have the right to choose their use) . However, recently (since the beginning of the 21st century), the vast majority of executions are carried out by lethal injection. The electric chair is also occasionally used. The other three methods have not been used since the late 20th century. They remain in the laws of only a small number of states, and all of these states also use lethal injection, and the use of alternative methods in many cases is limited by various conditions (for example, only those convicted who have committed a crime or received a death sentence before a certain date have the right to choose their use) .

Until February 8, 2008, Nebraska was the only state using the death penalty and not using injection (the only method here was the electric chair; on February 8, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled that this method was “cruel and unusual punishment” prohibited by the US Constitution; execution of death sentences was suspended until a new method of execution was approved). Until February 8, 2008, Nebraska was the only state using the death penalty and not using injection (the only method here was the electric chair; on February 8, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled that this method was “cruel and unusual punishment” prohibited by the US Constitution; execution of death sentences was suspended until a new method of execution was approved).

HISTORY OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN RUSSIA. The death penalty is one of the most ancient punishments known to Russian criminal law. In Ancient Rus', the death penalty was first mentioned in the Charter, given in 1397 by Grand Duke Vasily Dmitrievich to the residents of the Dvina land: for theft for the third time. The death penalty is one of the most ancient punishments known to Russian criminal law. In Ancient Rus', the death penalty was first mentioned in the Charter, given in 1397 by Grand Duke Vasily Dmitrievich to the residents of the Dvina land: for theft for the third time. In the Pskov Judgment Charter of 1497, the death penalty was established for 5 types of acts, in the Code of Laws of 1497 - for 10, in the Code of Laws of 1550 - for 13, in the Cathedral Code of 1649 - for more than 60. In the Pskov Judicial Charter of 1497 the death penalty was established for 5 types of acts, in the Code of Laws of 1497 - for 10, in the Code of Laws of 1550 - for 13, in the Council Code of 1649 - for more than 60.

The Code also regulated methods of execution, which were divided into simple (cutting off the head, hanging and drowning), which only caused death, and qualified (burning, pouring metal into the throat, impaling, quartering, wheeling, burying in the ground up to the neck, etc.). ), which prolonged the torment of the executed person. The Code also regulated methods of execution, which were divided into simple (cutting off the head, hanging and drowning), which only caused death, and qualified (burning, pouring metal into the throat, impaling, quartering, wheeling, burying in the ground up to the neck, etc.). ), which prolonged the torment of the executed person. The period of greatest use of the death penalty is considered to be the era of Peter I, but, unlike the Code of 1649, the number of methods of death penalty was reduced to three: execution, beheading, hanging. The period of greatest use of the death penalty is considered to be the era of Peter I, but, unlike the Code of 1649, the number of methods of death penalty was reduced to three: execution, beheading, hanging. Elizabeth suspended the execution of the death penalty, although she did not abolish it completely. The death penalty was replaced by whipping, branding and exile. Elizabeth suspended the execution of the death penalty, although she did not abolish it completely. The death penalty was replaced by whipping, branding and exile.

In April 1997, Russia signed the sixth protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights. According to it, in peacetime no one can be sentenced to death or executed. However, this document has not yet been ratified by the State Duma. A moratorium on the death penalty in Russia was introduced in 1999 - no criminal can be sentenced to death until jury trials begin to operate throughout the country. Now they are not available only in the Chechen Republic, but after the new year they will start working there too. Thus, there should no longer be any formal obstacles to the introduction of an exceptional penalty. However, on November 19, 2009, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation extended the moratorium on the death penalty and banned the use of the death penalty in the country even after January 1, 2010, when the moratorium on it in Russia expires. In April 1997, Russia signed the sixth protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights. According to it, in peacetime no one can be sentenced to death or executed. However, this document has not yet been ratified by the State Duma. A moratorium on the death penalty in Russia was introduced in 1999 - no criminal can be sentenced to death until jury trials begin to operate throughout the country. Now they are not available only in the Chechen Republic, but after the new year they will start working there too. Thus, there should no longer be any formal obstacles to the introduction of an exceptional penalty. However, on November 19, 2009, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation extended the moratorium on the death penalty and banned the use of the death penalty in the country even after January 1, 2010, when the moratorium on it in Russia expires.

Throughout history, many people, famous and not so famous, have expressed their thoughts regarding the death penalty. In the past, most people considered the death penalty to be a completely fair way of protecting society from a certain type of crime, and neither the death penalty itself nor its horrific types caused any discussion, condemnation, or outrage. Religion has always approved the use of the death penalty: “Vengeance is mine, and I will repay” (Old Testament), reinforcing this with the principle of talion: “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” although the main commandment of Christ is: “Thou shalt not kill.” In Russia, theoretical studies by lawyers and politicians, which expressed views on the limitation and complete abolition of the death penalty, appeared already in the 18th century. The first state in the world to abolish the death penalty for any crime was Venezuela in 1846. Interest in the institution of the death penalty increased after World War II. On the one hand, the death of millions of people devalued human life, on the other, fascism, with its terrible executions, gave rise to a new look at human life, its value and significance. In the criminal punishment system, the death penalty occupies a special place. Besides the fact that this measure is exceptional, it does not have the purpose of correction, like any punishment. The purpose of the death penalty is retribution. Sociological studies have shown that fear of punishment deters 14-24% of adult citizens from committing a crime. The death penalty does not give rise to a special legal consequence - a criminal record, but at the same time has one hundred percent private prevention. Throughout history, many people, famous and not so famous, have expressed their thoughts regarding the death penalty. In the past, most people considered the death penalty to be a completely fair way of protecting society from a certain type of crime, and neither the death penalty itself nor its horrific types caused any discussion, condemnation, or outrage. Religion has always approved the use of the death penalty: “Vengeance is mine, and I will repay” (Old Testament), reinforcing this with the principle of talion: “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” although the main commandment of Christ is: “Thou shalt not kill.” In Russia, theoretical studies by lawyers and politicians, which expressed views on the limitation and complete abolition of the death penalty, appeared already in the 18th century. The first state in the world to abolish the death penalty for any crime was Venezuela in 1846. Interest in the institution of the death penalty increased after World War II. On the one hand, the death of millions of people devalued human life, on the other, fascism, with its terrible executions, gave rise to a new look at human life, its value and significance. In the criminal punishment system, the death penalty occupies a special place. Besides the fact that this measure is exceptional, it does not have the purpose of correction, like any punishment. The purpose of the death penalty is retribution. Sociological studies have shown that fear of punishment deters 14-24% of adult citizens from committing a crime. The death penalty does not give rise to a special legal consequence - a criminal record, but at the same time has one hundred percent private prevention. PROS AND CONS OF THE DEATH PENALTY.

For: The death penalty is a deterrent, a legal restriction. Therefore, it serves as a means of protecting society from serious crimes. The death penalty is a deterrent, a legal restriction. Therefore, it serves as a means of protecting society from serious crimes. It has not yet been proven, either theoretically or practically, which punishment is more severe, that is, the death penalty or life imprisonment. It has not yet been proven, either theoretically or practically, which punishment is more severe, that is, the death penalty or life imprisonment. A person sentenced to life imprisonment, even if he is released on parole after twenty-five years, will not be a full-fledged person either physiologically or psychologically. A person sentenced to life imprisonment, even if he is released on parole after twenty-five years, will not be a full-fledged person either physiologically or psychologically.

Cons: The death penalty is a complete denial of human rights. Criminologists have long insisted that crime prevention requires increasing the likelihood of detection, not increasing violence. No one has ever proven that its use prevents crime more effectively than other types of punishment. The death penalty brutalizes all its participants. Execution is an act of violence, and violence tends to beget other violence. People who plan serious crimes, despite the risk of the death penalty, may still decide to carry out their planned crime, hoping that they will not be caught. Based on the theory of natural law, life is given by God (or nature) and only God can take it away.

Distribution of the death penalty in the world 1) Abolished (94 countries) 2) Abolished in ordinary legal proceedings, but retained for special legal proceedings (for example, in wartime law) (10 countries) 3) Not prohibited, but not used for at least 10 years (35 countries) 4) Applicable (58 countries)

For clarity, we present statistics for 1908. CountrySentencedExecuted Austria450 England2513 Belgium50 France496 Russia

Some statistics for the USA. In 1997, 74 people were executed and sentenced. By the way, the statement that predominantly “blacks” are sentenced, citing discrimination, is completely false: in 1997, 56% of whites and 42% of African-Americans were sentenced to death. 92% of executions were carried out by lethal injection. Some statistics for the USA. In 1997, 74 people were executed and sentenced. By the way, the statement that predominantly “blacks” are sentenced, citing discrimination, is completely false: in 1997, 56% of whites and 42% of African-Americans were sentenced to death. 92% of executions were carried out by lethal injection.

In 2000, 85 people were executed, 6 of them volunteers. 5 people were executed in the electric chair, the rest were given an injection. In 2000, 85 people were executed, 6 of them volunteers. 5 people were executed in the electric chair, the rest were given an injection. In 2001, 66 people were executed (all by injection). In 2001, 66 people were executed (all by injection). Since then, 147 people have been electrocuted, two have been shot, 11 have been gassed, three have been hanged and 586 people have been executed by injection. In total - 749 executed. Since then, 147 people have been electrocuted, two have been shot, 11 have been gassed, three have been hanged and 586 people have been executed by injection. In total - 749 executed.

Conclusion The abolition of the death penalty makes it possible to avoid irreparable miscarriages of justice. As long as there is even the slightest possibility of error, it is impossible to hand over the criminal to the hands of the executioner. As for the assertion that the fear of being executed can deter a potential criminal, it is highly controversial. The abolition of the death penalty makes it possible to avoid irreparable miscarriages of justice. As long as there is even the slightest possibility of error, it is impossible to hand over the criminal to the hands of the executioner. As for the assertion that the fear of being executed can deter a potential criminal, it is highly controversial. The death penalty has been practiced by mankind since time immemorial, but people continued to steal, rob and kill. Moreover, many methods of killing were distinguished by amazing cruelty, unlike those existing today. In addition, we are building a rule of law state in which the main value is human life. Maybe this will force someone to reconsider their attitude towards the institution of legalized murder.

Throughout history, many people, famous and not so famous, have expressed their thoughts regarding the death penalty. In the past, most people considered the death penalty to be a completely fair way of protecting society from a certain type of crime, and neither the death penalty itself nor its horrific types caused any discussion, condemnation, or outrage. Religion has always approved the use of the death penalty: “Vengeance is mine, and I will repay” (Old Testament), reinforcing this with the principle of talion: “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” although the main commandment of Christ is: “Thou shalt not kill.” In Russia, theoretical studies by lawyers and politicians, which expressed views on the limitation and complete abolition of the death penalty, appeared already in the 18th century. The first state in the world to abolish the death penalty for any crime was Venezuela in 1846. Interest in the institution of the death penalty increased after World War II. On the one hand, the death of millions of people devalued human life, on the other, fascism, with its terrible executions, gave rise to a new look at human life, its value and significance. In the criminal punishment system, the death penalty occupies a special place. Besides the fact that this measure is exceptional, it does not have the purpose of correction, like any punishment. The purpose of the death penalty is retribution. Sociological studies have shown that fear of punishment deters 14-24% of adult citizens from committing a crime. The death penalty does not give rise to a special legal consequence - a criminal record, but at the same time has one hundred percent private prevention.

To use presentation previews, create a Google account and log in to it: https://accounts.google.com

Slide captions:

EXECUTION CANNOT BE PARDLED Problems of abolition of the death penalty

The expression “cutting the Gordian knot” means making a quick and bold decision on a confusing and complex issue. This is exactly the question that will confront us today.

The Greeks and Romans depicted the goddess of justice with scales and a blindfold. Some called the goddess Themis, others called Justitia.

Is the death penalty a simple question? Is it possible to be indifferent when a matter of life and death is being decided? Will crime last forever? Is it easy to defeat crime? Do you agree that a crime wave is sweeping the country? Do you agree that the problem of terrorism is global, global? If a person is powerless to protect himself from attacks, should society and the state come to the rescue? Do you like the blood feud formula “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”? Are you capable of feeling compassion for a murderer? Do you know enough about the death penalty to judge objectively?

History of the use of the death penalty in Russia CHOOSE THE CORRECT ANSWER: The death penalty as a punishment exists: From the 11th (11th) century From the 12th (12th) century From the 13th (13th) century 2. What type of punishment could replace the death penalty, according to ancient laws: Life imprisonment Fine Forced labor 3. For what crime could a night criminal be killed on the spot: Theft Deception Blasphemy

Under which ruler was the death penalty used in 12 cases: Peter I Ivan the Terrible Nicholas II How did public execution affect crime: Crimes became less Crimes were committed as before Crimes became more Which of the Russian monarchs did not sign a single death warrant: Catherine II Elizaveta Petrovna Nikolai I Which state criminal was publicly executed during the time of Catherine II: Razin Pugachev Rasputin Which emperor signed the death warrant for the Decembrists: Nicholas II Nicholas I Alexander I

V. I. Surikov “Morning of the Streltsy Execution”

I.E. Repin “Saint Nicholas of Myra, saving three innocents from execution”,

I.I. Brodsky “Execution of 26 Baku commissars”

Is it possible to insure against miscarriages of justice? Can the mistake be corrected if the death penalty is carried out? Do you agree that it is more terrible to execute one innocent person than to acquit ten guilty people? Do you think that the death penalty is a humane punishment?

Every murder is a matter of hatred. It cannot be that a person kills a person out of love for him. The death penalty is one of the most terrible types of murder, because it is a cold, calculating, conscious, principled murder - murder without any affect, without any passion, without any purpose, murder for the sake of killing. And this is its main sin and horror. Sergei Nikolaevich Bulgakov

Lines of comparison Death penalty Murder Definition An exceptional measure of punishment that can be established for especially serious crimes that encroach on life. (Article 59 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) Intentional causing of death to another person (Article 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) Who decides the issue of life and death? Who is it directed against? Who will lose life? Punishment applies to a person found guilty of committing a crime. (Article 43 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) The main goal? Punishment is applied in order to restore social justice, as well as to correct the convicted person and prevent the commission of new crimes. (Article 43 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) Is it possible to avoid death? It is not prescribed to women, as well as to persons who committed crimes under the age of 18, and to men who have reached 65 years of age at the time of the court’s sentencing. The death penalty by way of pardon can be replaced by life imprisonment for a term of 25 years. (Article 59 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) How is it done?

“DILEMMA” Lines of comparison Death penalty Life imprisonment. Moral, religious and spiritual aspects Principle of justice Principle of humanity. Miscarriage of justice Prevention (prevention of new crimes) Political aspect Economic aspect

On the topic: methodological developments, presentations and notes

lesson-debate on a socio-political topic in grade 11 "Death penalty in Russia"

The Russian language lesson in grade 11 "Death penalty in Russia" was created on the basis of the "Debate" technology. I had to slightly modify the work in groups due to the small class size, but in large classes...

Death penalty: "pros and cons".

This work is devoted to the consideration of the death penalty in Russia from ancient times to the present day. And also the position of scientists regarding this punishment....

We believe that life is sacred, and no one has the right to take it away. You still can’t bring back the dead. The killing of the criminal himself by the state will not bring any benefit; the relatives of the victims of the crime will not receive true relief. The most difficult state of mind, repentance, remorse, mental suffering - is their severity commensurate with the moment of physical death? If a person sentenced to life imprisonment dreams of death, then there is suffering worse than death itself. Loneliness, meaningless and meaningless pastime, lack of perspective - this is a serious punishment. Then the fierce killer will come to an epiphany, thoughts about the people he has ruined, about his own soul.

Target: To develop students’ understanding of the complexity and controversy of the problem of abolition of the death penalty in the Russian Federation.

Tasks:

• Show the essence of the problems associated with the abolition of the death penalty.
• Encourage students to understand alternative points of view and develop respect for opposing opinions.

Preparation for the lesson: Individual assignments for students (to prepare material on supporters of the death penalty and opponents of the death penalty in the Russian Federation - Presentation), conduct a survey among students of the Vidim Secondary School (grades 8–11).

During the classes

Teacher's opening remarks: Many people understand that discussions about the prohibition of the death penalty are perceived in society with distrust, and motives of softness are heard in them. Most children ask: “What if he killed five children with particular cruelty?”

We believe that life is sacred, and no one has the right to take it away. You still can’t bring back the dead. The killing of the criminal himself by the state will not bring any benefit; the relatives of the victims of the crime will not receive true relief. The most difficult state of mind, repentance, remorse, mental suffering - is their severity commensurate with the moment of physical death? Loneliness, meaningless and meaningless pastime, lack of perspective - this is a serious punishment. It is then that any killer will come to an epiphany, thoughts about the people he has ruined, about his own soul.

Does everyone think so? The problem of the death penalty currently worries a significant part of humanity; there are both supporters and opponents of the death penalty. Today in class I propose to express my point of view on this pressing issue. Try to decide which side you are on.

The teacher suggests: View a presentation that reflects the views of opponents and supporters of the death penalty. (The presentation is given by two students, one a supporter of the death penalty, the other an opponent).

Watching the presentation makes the kids think. A problem arises that the teacher can formulate: “Is the death penalty necessary? Is it fair to take the life of a person, even if he has committed a terrible crime?” To determine his decision, the teacher proposes to compare the articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which proclaims the right to life, and the article of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which provides for the gradual abolition of the exceptional penalty - the death penalty.

Tasks for students:

1. Read the article carefully. 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
2. Do you agree with the opinion of lawyers that the use of the death penalty contradicts the norms of the Declaration?
3. Study the text of the article. 20 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
4. How does it address the issue of the death penalty?
5. Determine your attitude towards maintaining the death penalty in Russia.

While the students are working, the teacher prepares a table on the board in which the children’s arguments will be posted.

THE DEATH PENALTY

The information that students are introduced to is new to them. Therefore, you need to allocate 7–10 minutes to comprehend and study it. As usual, the guys are divided into two groups (supporters, opponents) of the death penalty. It is advisable to invite the children to write down the arguments “For” and “Cons” (fill out the table).

The exchange of information can be structured in the form of debates.

The purpose of debate is to reach a decision after presenting opposing points of view.

The teacher reminds students that the lesson discusses the problem of the death penalty in Russia, the use of which is a violation of the human right to life. The guys are invited to listen to each other and then make a change in their attitude towards the death penalty or confirm their position

Rules for debates.

1. Then the word goes to one of the “opponents”
2. The “defender” of the death penalty begins his speech.
3. Starting with the second speaker, each speech should consist of two parts: a refutation of the arguments of the previous speaker; presenting your arguments.
4. The group may take 20–30 seconds to prepare counterarguments.

The most difficult thing is to ensure compliance with the third rule. You can use the following technique: the teacher crosses out the argument written on the board if opponents manage to refute it.

At the end of the lesson, students are given the opportunity to comment on the following question:

1. What was your attitude towards the death penalty at the beginning of the lesson?
2. How did your attitude towards the problem change at the end of the lesson?
3. What argument changed (fixed) this relationship.

Those who have come to the conclusion that their previous position was wrong can be asked to move to the appropriate group.

Candidate B was supported by only 21% of voters. 45% of voters living in this state took part in the elections. Three governments have changed in six months. 6. Can women vote in elections? 8.What electoral system is used to form the State Duma of the Russian Federation? What restrictions or qualifications do you know in the Russian Federation? 3.What electoral systems exist? Why are elections needed? Suffrage.

“Crime and its types” - Murder. Compulsory and corrective labor. Imprisonment for a specified period. Types of punishments imposed on minors. Theft of personal property. Vagrancy. How are crimes classified depending on their nature? Deprivation of the right to engage in certain activities. A socially dangerous act committed guilty of guilt. Compulsory educational measures. Rendering of transport means or means of communication unusable.

“Rights, freedoms, duties of citizens of the Russian Federation” - Civil law. Administrative responsibility. Conditions for ending a marriage. Citizen K. gave his son his car for his birthday. Labor law. Social rights. Human rights. Protection of human rights. Criminal penalty. System of rights and freedoms of man and citizen. The concept of rights, freedoms and responsibilities. Conditions for marriage. Judgments on the employment of minors. Organizations protecting consumer rights.

"Housing Law" - Rights. Housing stock. "Housing law". Housing fund Article 19. Exchange agreement. The totality of all residential premises suitable for habitation by citizens. Responsibilities. Article 40 1. Everyone has the right to housing. Donation agreement. Lifetime maintenance agreement with dependents. Ownership. Housing legal relations. Contract of sale. Social Use Fund. A set of relations related to residential premises, in particular:

“The concept of labor relations” - Specifics of employment of minors. Minimum duration of vacation. Personal desire of the employee. Document. Check the correct statements. Employment. The role of labor. Financially responsible work. Certificate of family income. Employer. Passport. Unemployed. Teenager. Responsibilities of the employee. The boss's friend. The meaning of the concept. Features of legal norms. Right to work. Application of labor.

“Right to family” - Right. Age at which men marry. No one should be tortured. The right to rest and freedom. Attitude to freedom of thought. The violator may be punished. Marriage. Right to family. Right to freedom. Right to freedom of opinion. Freedom of conscience. Conditions for marriage. Freedom of thought and speech. Every person has the right to freedom of thought. The right to freedom of thought. Every citizen has the right to a family.